宣布JavaScript 2017状况调查 (Announcing the State of JavaScript 2017 Survey)

让我们找出去年以来发生的变化！ (Let’s find out what’s changed since last year!)

In a hurry? You can take the survey here.

匆忙？ 您可以在这里进行调查。

When I launched the first State of JavaScript survey last year, it was mostly to scratch my own itch. I wanted to know what libraries were worth learning, and which ones were on the way out.

去年我发起第一次JavaScript状态调查时，主要是为了摸索。我想知道哪些图书馆值得学习，哪些正在淘汰。

It turns out, I wasn’t the only one with that itch. Over 9,000 people took the time to answer the survey’s 89 questions. The resulting data was a trove of interesting insights.

事实证明，我不是唯一一个发痒的人。超过9,000人花时间回答了调查的89个问题。产生的数据是许多有趣的见解。

For example, we learned that although 11% of respondents had ever tried Vue, 89% of Vue users were happy enough to continue using it. And, on the other hand, although 64% of respondents had used Angular, only 47% of Angular users were looking forward to working with it again.

例如，我们了解到，尽管有11％的受访者曾经尝试过Vue ，但89％的Vue用户对继续使用它感到满意。另一方面，尽管64％的受访者使用过Angular，但只有47％的Angular用户希望再次使用它。

You can find many more data points like this by exploring the 2016 results.

通过探索2016年的结果，您可以找到更多类似的数据点。

更好的数据 (Better Data)

So what’s new for 2017? One criticism we got last time was that it wasn’t clear where the data was coming from. Where were the respondents located? How did they hear about the survey?

那么，2017年有什么新消息？我们上次收到的批评是，不清楚数据来自何处。受访者在哪里？他们是如何得知这项调查的？

For that reason, the survey will also track metadata like your referrer, location, browser type, and so on. Of course, it goes without saying that this data will remain completely anonymous.

因此，调查还将跟踪元数据，例如您的引荐来源网址，位置，浏览器类型等。当然，不用说此数据将保持完全匿名。

Hopefully that extra metadata will let us do cool things, like comparing geographic trends, or seeing if respondents coming from, say, Reddit vs Hacker News tend to use different technologies.

希望额外的元数据可以让我们做一些很棒的事情，例如比较地理趋势，或者看看来自Reddit vs Hacker News的受访者是否倾向于使用不同的技术。

新问题 (New Questions)

We made a few changes to the questions. Some technologies are out (like CoffeeScript and Cucumber), while some are in (like Reason and Flow).

我们对问题进行了一些更改。有些技术已经淘汰(例如CoffeeScript和Cucumber)，而有些技术已经淘汰(例如Reason和Flow)。

Of course, you can still fill in your framework of choice in the “Other” section even if it’s missing from the main options.

当然，即使主选项中缺少选择的框架，您仍然可以在“其他”部分中填写选择的框架。

We also changed the structure of the question groups slightly. Instead of trying to isolate each layer of the stack in its own group, we now have larger, more inclusive groupings such as “Data Layer” or “Back-end.”

我们还稍微更改了问题组的结构。现在，我们不再尝试将堆栈的每一层都隔离在其自己的组中，而是拥有更大，更具包容性的分组，例如“数据层”或“后端”。

Of course, no organization is perfect. For example, GraphQL, Redux, and Apollo all end up in the same Data Layer group, even though they’re all complementary technologies. But hopefully it’ll still make some amount of sense to you.

当然，没有组织是完美的。例如，GraphQL，Redux和Apollo最终都属于同一数据层组，即使它们都是互补技术也是如此。但是希望它对您仍然有意义。

StateOfJS团队的新成员 (A New StateOfJS Team Member)

I ran last year’s survey by myself, but since I wanted to do more with the results this time around, I got my friend Michael Rambeau to come on board as well.

我自己进行了去年的调查，但是由于这次我想对结果做更多的事情，所以我也邀请了我的朋友迈克尔·兰博 ( Michael Rambeau)加入。

Michael runs BestOfJS, a live directory that tracks open-source JavaScript libraries and provides detailed stats on their popularity. So I think there’s no better person to help with the State of JS project!

Michael运行BestOfJS ，这是一个实时目录，该目录跟踪开源JavaScript库并提供有关其流行程度的详细统计信息。因此，我认为没有更好的人来协助State JS项目！