Stable-Diffusion-XL-Burn:SDXL in Rust
在reddit上看到这个项目 Stable-Diffusion-XL-Burn
,它 是一个基于 Rust 的项目,将stable diffusion xl 移植到了 Rust 深度学习框架 burn 中。在reddit回帖上,已经有小伙伴在热情的尝试,还有小伙伴问到,“what's the performance difference to Pytorch on GPU/CPU?” 社区有小伙伴对这个项目感兴趣吗?👀
Github repo: https://github.com/Gadersd/stable-diffusion-xl-burn 阅读原文:https://www.reddit.com/r/rust/comments/1613ajv/stable_diffusion_xl_in_rust/
Rust 1.72.0 stable发布
Rust Release Team在 Rust Blog上官宣了1.72.0版本的发布,可以使用如下命令,获取1.72.0:
rustup update stable
阅读原文了解更多:https://blog.rust-lang.org/2023/08/24/Rust-1.72.0.html
Rust嵌入式领域应用:Rust on ESP32
这是一篇叙述如何使用 ESP32 和 esp-idf-hal 驱动 LED 点阵的文章,准确说是“ESP32 Standard Library Embedded Rust”,有关SPI 与 MAX7219 LED 点阵。
阅读原文:ESP32 Standard Library Embedded Rust: SPI with the MAX7219 LED Dot Matrix, https://apollolabsblog.hashnode.dev/esp32-standard-library-embedded-rust-spi-with-the-max7219-led-dot-matrix?ref=twitter-share
Rust vs Zig:在性能、安全以及更多方面的对比
根据介绍,原文作者是一名后端&区块链开发工程师,全文可以分为三大板块,一块是讲Rust,一块是讲Zig,还有一块是讲二者的对比。当然,作者也在文末表达了自己的看法,没有什么“Winner”,每个语言都有自己的优势与劣势,在使用一门语言钱=前应该去了解、去研究它。
小编的看法是,不知道为什么,最近Zig突然“小火🔥了一把”,网上有关Zig和Rust之间对比的文章也多了起来。相比Rust,Zig还是一个太初期的语言,还需要时间发展。相比Rust,如果更加关注与现有C代码进行集成,同时还要在性能与内存安全之间找到平衡,说不定可以考虑下Zig。但是更多的,还是要考虑实际的项目需求,个人喜好和未来发展方向么,然后做出选择。这里不引战嗷!
下面有一个表格给我们展示了二者的不同之处,
Feature | Rust | Zig |
---|---|---|
Memory safety | Rust uses its strict ownership and borrowing rules to ensure that any code a developer writes is safe. | Zig uses mechanisms that track and control memory allocation and deallocation to prevent any code that a developer writes from being unsafe. |
Syntax | Rust emphasizes ownership and lifetimes through explicit annotations, which can lead to longer code. | Zig follows a C-like syntax. |
Ecosystem | Rust offers a robust ecosystem, including libraries, tools, and community support | Zig is a younger language with a more miniature ecosystem. |
Interoperability | Rust has decent FFI compatibility. It works well calling Rust functions from C but it can be challenging to call C functions from Rust. | Zig has a superior FFI. It works well calling C functions from Zig and calling Zig functions from C. |
Error Handling | Rust uses Result and Option types for explicit error handling | Zig uses error types, error unions, and deferred statements for error handling |
Package manager | Rut uses cargo package manager for handling packages and dependencies | Zig uses its built-in package manager for handling packages and dependencies |
二者的相同之处是:
Memory safety
Low-level control
Performance optimization
Community and availability
No undefined behavior
具体可以直达原文进行阅读。
阅读原文:https://blog.logrocket.com/comparing-rust-vs-zig-performance-safety-more/
梗图:I spend my day coding in rust today
X Posts or Tweets:https://twitter.com/tony_mushah/status/1695074658175889881?s=20
From 日报小组 Lambert
社区学习交流平台订阅:
Rustcc 论坛: 支持 rss
微信公众号:Rust语言中文社区