下载: 虾米音乐_您所说的内容：如何组织凌乱的音乐收藏

下载: 虾米音乐

Earlier this week we asked you to share your tips, tricks, and tools, for managing a messy music collection. Now we’re back to share so great reader tips; read on to find ways to tame your mountain of music.

本周早些时候，我们要求您分享一些技巧，窍门和工具，以管理混乱的音乐收藏。现在，我们回到分享如此出色的读者提示；请继续阅读以找到驯服音乐之路的方法。

Several readers were, despite having tried various techniques over the years, fans of doing things largely the manual way. Aurora900 explains:

尽管这些年来已经尝试了各种技术，但仍有一些读者喜欢使用手动方式做事。 Aurora900解释：

I spent a weekend sorting everything myself once. Took a while, but now I have folders sorted by artist, and within the artist folders are folders for their albums. With my collection at about 260gb, it can be a daunting task, but it’s well worth it in the end. I don’t have the tagging issue as I make sure anything I have is properly tagged to begin with… If I’m ripping a CD I use Easy CD-DA Extractor, which automatically searches a database on the internet for the tags. If I’m downloading something, if its from a reputable source its going to be properly tagged already.
我花了一个周末自己整理了所有东西。花费了一段时间，但现在我有按艺术家排序的文件夹，并且在艺术家文件夹中是其专辑的文件夹。我的收藏集约为260gb，这可能是一个艰巨的任务，但最终还是值得的。我没有标签问题，因为我确保已正确标记了所有内容……如果我要翻录CD，请使用Easy CD-DA Extractor ，它会自动在Internet上的数据库中搜索标签。如果我要下载东西，如果它是从信誉良好的来源下载的，则已经被正确标记了。

Bilbo Baggins would love to automate, but eclectic music tastes make it hard:

Bilbo Baggins希望实现自动化，但是折衷的音乐品味使它变得困难：

I once spent days tagging each individual song with MP3tag so they all had the correct artist, album, album art work. MusicBrainz Picard and WinAmp autotagging wouldn’t work for me because of the “obscure” music I have. Then I just plug it into MediaMonkey, organize by Artist/Album/TrackNumber – SongTitle.mp3. And whenever I download new music, I just add it in by hand like that.
我曾经花了几天的时间用MP3tag标记每首歌曲，因此它们都有正确的艺术家，专辑和专辑封面。由于我的音乐“模糊”， MusicBrainz Picard和WinAmp自动标记对我不起作用。然后我将其插入MediaMonkey ，按Artist / Album / TrackNumber – SongTitle.mp3进行组织。每当我下载新音乐时，我就这样手工添加。

Lenny shares his manual sorting method:

Lenny分享了他的手动排序方法：

My system is to change the tags and filenames by hand, using online album track listings as a reference.

我的系统是使用在线专辑曲目列表作为参考来手动更改标签和文件名。

—

-

Long description:

详细描述：

Using album pages on Wikipedia (or sites like Amazon, when the Wiki page isn’t available), I rename every track with number and title (e.g. “10. NASA is On Your Side”), and if needed, manually change the track number and title in the tags. I then select everything and blanket-change the Artist, Album Artist, Album and Year (in this example, “Everything Everything”, “Man Alive” and “2010″ – great album, by the way).

使用Wikipedia上的专辑页面(或当Wiki页面不可用时，在Amazon之类的网站上)，我用编号和标题(例如“ 10. NASA在你身边”)重命名每条轨道，并在需要时手动更改轨道标签中的编号和标题。然后，我选择所有内容并一揽子更改艺术家，专辑艺术家，专辑和年份(在此示例中，“所有内容”，“ Man Alive”和“ 2010” –很好的专辑)。

These tracks go in a folder named first with the year, then the album title (“[2010] Man Alive”), which itself is in the artist folder (“Everything Everything”). I have the added bonus of albums being listed in release order within the artist folder. These artist folders go into a folder for my music library, whilst everything I am yet to organize is in a general “!SORT” folder.

这些曲目会放在一个首先带有年份的文件夹中，然后是专辑名称(“ [2010] Man Alive”)，该文件夹本身在艺术家文件夹中(“ Everything Everything”)。我在艺人文件夹中按发行顺序列出了专辑，这是我的加成。这些艺术家文件夹会放入我的音乐库的文件夹中，而我尚未整理的所有内容都在常规的“！SORT”文件夹中。

Every time I find myself wanting to add music to my library, I go through the above steps. It works well, but it can be time consuming – I’ve only done 8gb of a 120gb library in the six months since getting annoyed with, and wiping, my terribly organized iTunes library. However, it does mean I’m not regularly skipping songs when they come on because I don’t actually like that album (and wondering why it’s still in my library).
每当我发现自己想向音乐库中添加音乐时，我都会执行上述步骤。它运作良好，但是却很耗时–自从烦恼并抹掉了我组织得非常严密的iTunes库以来，我在六个月内只完成了120gb库中的8gb。但是，这确实意味着我不会定期跳过歌曲，因为我实际上并不喜欢该专辑(并想知道为什么它仍在我的音乐库中)。

Other readers sang praise for automation tools like Music Brainz Picard. Kerenksy97 writes:

其他读者对诸如Music Brainz Picard之类的自动化工具赞不绝口。 Kerenksy97写道：

MusicBrainz Picard. I have OCD for the tracks being right, Free-DB is a mess, and Amazon doesn’t have consistent syntax. MB is like the wikipedia of album databases with set rules, open source programming, and user input corrections and voting.

MusicBrainz Picard 。我有正确的OCD，Free-DB一片混乱，Amazon没有一致的语法。 MB就像专辑数据库的维基百科一样，具有设置规则，开源编程以及用户输入的更正和投票。

As for actually listening I use MusicBee but by time they get there the tracks have been tagged by Picard, cleaned by MP3tag, and normalized with mp3gain.
至于实际的收听，我使用MusicBee，但是到了他们到达那里的时候，这些音轨已经被Picard标记，被MP3tag清除，并被mp3gain归一化了。

Another popular tool is Media Monkey; Wander writes:

另一个流行的工具是Media Monkey。漫步写道：

MediaMonkey definitely, I simply move any new audio files in a specific folder, and they instantly get renamed to a nice filename (Artist – Year. Album – Track. Title.ext) and moved to a nicely organized directory (/music/artist/year. album/), and all mp3 tags are set correctly as well One click of a button and all songs have their volumes the same, another click and all songs have album art, another click and all songs have lyrics, and so on

MediaMonkey当然，我只是将所有新音频文件移动到特定文件夹中，然后它们立即被重命名为一个不错的文件名(艺术家-年。专辑-曲目。Title.ext)，并移动到一个组织良好的目录(/ music / artist /年份/专辑/)，以及所有mp3标签的设置也都正确设置一次单击按钮，所有歌曲的音量都相同，再次单击，所有歌曲的专辑封面，再次单击，所有歌曲的歌词，依此类推

MM is also fast as hell, got about 10 000 songs and it loads the whole list in about 2 seconds.
MM也快如地狱，获得了约10,000首歌曲，并且在大约2秒钟内加载了整个列表。