C++多线程(二)(_beginThreadex创建多线程)
C/C++ Runtime 多线程函数
一 简单实例(来自codeprojct:http://www.codeproject.com/useritems/MultithreadingTutorial.asp)
主线程创建2个线程t1和t2,创建时2个线程就被挂起,后来调用ResumeThread恢复2个线程,是其开始执行,调用WaitForSingleObject等待2个线程执行完,然后推出主线程即结束进程。
*
* This program is an adaptation of the code Rex Jaeschke showed in
* Listing 1 of his Oct 2005 C/C++ User's Journal article entitled
* "C++/CLI Threading: Part I". I changed it from C++/CLI (managed)
* code to standard C++.
*
* One hassle is the fact that C++ must employ a free (C) function
* or a static class member function as the thread entry function.
*
* This program must be compiled with a multi-threaded C run-time
* (/MT for LIBCMT.LIB in a release build or /MTd for LIBCMTD.LIB
* in a debug build).
*
* John Kopplin 7/2006
*/
#include <stdio.h>
#include <string> // for STL string class
#include <windows.h> // for HANDLE
#include <process.h> // for _beginthread()
using namespace std;
class ThreadX
{
private:
int loopStart;
int loopEnd;
int dispFrequency;
public:
string threadName;
ThreadX( int startValue, int endValue, int frequency )
{
loopStart = startValue;
loopEnd = endValue;
dispFrequency = frequency;
}
// In C++ you must employ a free (C) function or a static
// class member function as the thread entry-point-function.
// Furthermore, _beginthreadex() demands that the thread
// entry function signature take a single (void*) and returned
// an unsigned.
static unsigned __stdcall ThreadStaticEntryPoint(void * pThis)
{
ThreadX * pthX = (ThreadX*)pThis; // the tricky cast
pthX->ThreadEntryPoint(); // now call the true entry-point-function
// A thread terminates automatically if it completes execution,
// or it can terminate itself with a call to _endthread().
return 1; // the thread exit code
}
void ThreadEntryPoint()
{
// This is the desired entry-point-function but to get
// here we have to use a 2 step procedure involving
// the ThreadStaticEntryPoint() function.
for (int i = loopStart; i <= loopEnd; ++i)
{
if (i % dispFrequency == 0)
{
printf( "%s: i = %d\n", threadName.c_str(), i );
}
}
printf( "%s thread terminating\n", threadName.c_str() );
}
};
int main()
{
// All processes get a primary thread automatically. This primary
// thread can generate additional threads. In this program the
// primary thread creates 2 additional threads and all 3 threads
// then run simultaneously without any synchronization. No data
// is shared between the threads.
// We instantiate an object of the ThreadX class. Next we will
// create a thread and specify that the thread is to begin executing
// the function ThreadEntryPoint() on object o1. Once started,
// this thread will execute until that function terminates or
// until the overall process terminates.
ThreadX * o1 = new ThreadX( 0, 1, 2000 );
// When developing a multithreaded WIN32-based application with
// Visual C++, you need to use the CRT thread functions to create
// any threads that call CRT functions. Hence to create and terminate
// threads, use _beginthreadex() and _endthreadex() instead of
// the Win32 APIs CreateThread() and EndThread().
// The multithread library LIBCMT.LIB includes the _beginthread()
// and _endthread() functions. The _beginthread() function performs
// initialization without which many C run-time functions will fail.
// You must use _beginthread() instead of CreateThread() in C programs
// built with LIBCMT.LIB if you intend to call C run-time functions.
// Unlike the thread handle returned by _beginthread(), the thread handle
// returned by _beginthreadex() can be used with the synchronization APIs.
HANDLE hth1;
unsigned uiThread1ID;
hth1 = (HANDLE)_beginthreadex( NULL, // security
0, // stack size
ThreadX::ThreadStaticEntryPoint,
o1, // arg list
CREATE_SUSPENDED, // so we can later call ResumeThread()
&uiThread1ID );
if ( hth1 == 0 )
printf("Failed to create thread 1\n");
DWORD dwExitCode;
GetExitCodeThread( hth1, &dwExitCode ); // should be STILL_ACTIVE = 0x00000103 = 259
printf( "initial thread 1 exit code = %u\n", dwExitCode );
// The System::Threading::Thread object in C++/CLI has a "Name" property.
// To create the equivalent functionality in C++ I added a public data member
// named threadName.
o1->threadName = "t1";
ThreadX * o2 = new ThreadX( -1000000, 0, 2000 );
HANDLE hth2;
unsigned uiThread2ID;
hth2 = (HANDLE)_beginthreadex( NULL, // security
0, // stack size
ThreadX::ThreadStaticEntryPoint,
o2, // arg list
CREATE_SUSPENDED, // so we can later call ResumeThread()
&uiThread2ID );
if ( hth2 == 0 )
printf("Failed to create thread 2\n");
GetExitCodeThread( hth2, &dwExitCode ); // should be STILL_ACTIVE = 0x00000103 = 259
printf( "initial thread 2 exit code = %u\n", dwExitCode );
o2->threadName = "t2";
// If we hadn't specified CREATE_SUSPENDED in the call to _beginthreadex()
// we wouldn't now need to call ResumeThread().
ResumeThread( hth1 ); // serves the purpose of Jaeschke's t1->Start()
ResumeThread( hth2 );//你需要恢复线程的句柄 使用该函数能够激活线程的运行
// In C++/CLI the process continues until the last thread exits.
// That is, the thread's have independent lifetimes. Hence
// Jaeschke's original code was designed to show that the primary
// thread could exit and not influence the other threads.
// However in C++ the process terminates when the primary thread exits
// and when the process terminates all its threads are then terminated.
// Hence if you comment out the following waits, the non-primary
// threads will never get a chance to run.
WaitForSingleObject( hth1, INFINITE );
WaitForSingleObject( hth2, INFINITE );
//WaitForSingleObject 函数用来检测 hHandle 事件的信号状态,当函数的执行时间超过 dwMilliseconds 就返回,
//但如果参数 dwMilliseconds 为 INFINITE 时函数将直到相应时间事件变成有信号状态才返回,否则就一直等待下去
//,直到 WaitForSingleObject 有返回直才执行后面的代码
GetExitCodeThread( hth1, &dwExitCode );
printf( "thread 1 exited with code %u\n", dwExitCode );
GetExitCodeThread( hth2, &dwExitCode );
printf( "thread 2 exited with code %u\n", dwExitCode );
//
//GetExitCodeThread这个函数是获得线程的退出码, 第二个参数是一个 DWORD的指针,
//用户应该使用一个 DWORD 类型的变量去接收数据,返回的数据是线程的退出码,
//第一个参数是线程句柄,用 CreateThread 创建线程时获得到。
//通过线程退出码可以判断线程是否正在运行,还是已经退出。
// The handle returned by _beginthreadex() has to be closed
// by the caller of _beginthreadex().
CloseHandle( hth1 );
CloseHandle( hth2 );
delete o1;
o1 = NULL;
delete o2;
o2 = NULL;
printf("Primary thread terminating.\n");
}
二解释
1)如果你正在编写C/C++代码,决不应该调用CreateThread。相反,应该使用VisualC++运行期库函数_beginthreadex,推出也应该使用_endthreadex。如果不使用Microsoft的VisualC++编译器,你的编译器供应商有它自己的CreateThred替代函数。不管这个替代函数是什么,你都必须使用。
2)因为_beginthreadex和_endthreadex是CRT线程函数,所以必须注意编译选项runtimelibaray的选择,使用MT或MTD。
3) _beginthreadex函数的参数列表与CreateThread函数的参数列表是相同的,但是参数名和类型并不完全相同。这是因为Microsoft的C/C++运行期库的开发小组认为,C/C++运行期函数不应该对Windows数据类型有任何依赖。_beginthreadex函数也像CreateThread那样,返回新创建的线程的句柄。
下面是关于_beginthreadex的一些要点:
&8226;每个线程均获得由C/C++运行期库的堆栈分配的自己的tiddata内存结构。(tiddata结构位于Mtdll.h文件中的VisualC++源代码中)。
&8226;传递给_beginthreadex的线程函数的地址保存在tiddata内存块中。传递给该函数的参数也保存在该数据块中。
&8226;_beginthreadex确实从内部调用CreateThread,因为这是操作系统了解如何创建新线程的唯一方法。
&8226;当调用CreatetThread时,它被告知通过调用_threadstartex而不是pfnStartAddr来启动执行新线程。还有,传递给线程函数的参数是tiddata结构而不是pvParam的地址。
&8226;如果一切顺利,就会像CreateThread那样返回线程句柄。如果任何操作失败了,便返回NULL。
4) _endthreadex的一些要点:
&8226;C运行期库的_getptd函数内部调用操作系统的TlsGetValue函数,该函数负责检索调用线程的tiddata内存块的地址。
&8226;然后该数据块被释放,而操作系统的ExitThread函数被调用,以便真正撤消该线程。当然,退出代码要正确地设置和传递。
5)虽然也提供了简化版的的_beginthread和_endthread,但是可控制性太差,所以一般不使用。
6)线程handle因为是内核对象,所以需要在最后closehandle。
7)更多的API:
HANDLE GetCurrentProcess();
HANDLE GetCurrentThread();
DWORD GetCurrentProcessId();
DWORD GetCurrentThreadId()。
DWORD SetThreadIdealProcessor(HANDLE hThread,DWORD dwIdealProcessor);
BOOL SetThreadPriority(HANDLE hThread,int nPriority);
BOOL SetPriorityClass(GetCurrentProcess(), IDLE_PRIORITY_CLASS);
BOOL GetThreadContext(HANDLE hThread,PCONTEXT pContext);BOOL SwitchToThread();
三注意
1)C++主线程的终止,同时也会终止所有主线程创建的子线程,不管子线程有没有执行完毕。所以上面的代码中如果不调用WaitForSingleObject,则2个子线程t1和t2可能并没有执行完毕或根本没有执行。
2)如果某线程挂起,然后有调用WaitForSingleObject等待该线程,就会导致死锁。所以上面的代码如果不调用resumethread,则会死锁。
为什么要用C运行时库的_beginthreadex代替操作系统的CreateThread来创建线程?
来源自自1999年7月MSJ杂志的《Win32 Q&A》栏目
你也许会说我一直用CreateThread来创建线程,一直都工作得好好的,为什么要用_beginthreadex来代替CreateThread,下面让我来告诉你为什么。
回答一个问题可以有两种方式,一种是简单的,一种是复杂的。
如果你不愿意看下面的长篇大论,那我可以告诉你简单的答案:_beginthreadex在内部调用了CreateThread,在调用之前_beginthreadex做了很多的工作,从而使得它比CreateThread更安全。