看着这个代码的目的是只注册一次sighandler，但是这个判定是否可以保证一次？但是根据代码看，其实不会有关键区的读写，所以即使有同步问题，也不会产生什么特别的影响。所以代码没有问题，但是这是一个坑。

int
__pthread_cancel (pthread_t th)
{volatile struct pthread *pd = (volatile struct pthread *) th;if (pd->tid == 0)/* The thread has already exited on the kernel side.  Its outcome(regular exit, other cancelation) has already beendetermined.  */return 0;static int init_sigcancel = 0;if (atomic_load_relaxed (&init_sigcancel) == 0){struct sigaction sa;sa.sa_sigaction = sigcancel_handler;/* The signal handle should be non-interruptible to avoid the risk ofspurious EINTR caused by SIGCANCEL sent to process or ifpthread_cancel() is called while cancellation is disabled in thetarget thread.  */sa.sa_flags = SA_SIGINFO | SA_RESTART;__sigemptyset (&sa.sa_mask);__libc_sigaction (SIGCANCEL, &sa, NULL);atomic_store_relaxed (&init_sigcancel, 1);}